Timeline for Why are quasi-isomorphisms of homotopy algebras only defined for arity 1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2016 at 23:28 | vote | accept | Marcel Rubió | ||
| Apr 12, 2016 at 23:28 | comment | added | Marcel Rubió | In particular, in the first paper you linked, at 0.24 of the introduction, you talk a bit about deformation theory. From what I read, is it right to think that there are statements like: 'given a weak equivalence between two curved algebras A and B (weak equivalence in the sense that you described for Q2), the respective deformation functors are isomorphic' ? | |
| Apr 12, 2016 at 23:22 | comment | added | Marcel Rubió | thank you for your answers! I appreciate you sharing your papers. I did not know about curved $A_\infty$-algebras, but I will try to read more about them --I imagine that deformation theory in the setting of curved $A_\infty$-algebras would be difficult (because of gauge/homotopy equivalence?). | |
| Apr 12, 2016 at 19:34 | history | edited | Leonid Positselski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
a sentence inserted in "Q2
|
| Apr 12, 2016 at 18:18 | history | answered | Leonid Positselski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |