Timeline for Geometric interpretation of minimal number of generators of a module
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2016 at 13:59 | history | edited | charlie katerba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 13, 2016 at 13:55 | comment | added | charlie katerba | Yes, that's exactly what I mean. | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 6:14 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | For rings, the term finitely generated [as an algebra] usually refers to ring extensions that can be written as $R[x_1,\ldots,x_n]/I$. However, when you write that $\mathbb C[X]$ is finitely generated over $\mathbb C[f]$, it seems that you mean that $\mathbb C[X]$ is finite over $\mathbb C[f]$ (i.e. finitely generated as a module). | |
| Apr 12, 2016 at 0:35 | history | edited | charlie katerba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added small realization
|
| Apr 9, 2016 at 20:37 | history | edited | charlie katerba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed typo
|
| Apr 9, 2016 at 20:31 | history | edited | Sebastian Goette | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Link added
|
| Apr 9, 2016 at 20:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 9, 2016 at 20:31 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2016 at 20:11 | history | asked | charlie katerba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |