Timeline for At what point would an elementary generalization of Bertrand's Postulate be interesting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 19, 2016 at 13:46 | comment | added | marh_g | @StefanKohl yes it does in the sense that you can vastly improve the k to 6k/5 bound to finding a prime between k and 101k/100. That is, from a 1.2 factor to 1.01. | |
Apr 9, 2016 at 11:44 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | @GerryMyerson Ordinarily I do just that, and in fact I did that before with a very similar post (which OP appreciated); see below the accepted answer. But then when people began making comments on his comment and OP was unable to respond, he/she flagged to explain so. In view of this and Sebastian's comment, I'm going to keep this answer, at least temporarily. | |
Apr 9, 2016 at 3:21 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | @Todd, can't you, as a mod, convert an answer to comments, regardless of how many points the person has? | |
Apr 8, 2016 at 17:41 | comment | added | Sebastian Goette | @ToddTrimble At least marh_g followed the advice given in this meta answer. And imho, this "answer" is interesting enough not to be deleted immediately. | |
Apr 8, 2016 at 17:01 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Dear fellow MO users: the author of this post doesn't have the rep to make comments in response to comments under someone else's post, but would like to do so. I propose that we keep this "answer" for a while and then convert the kit and caboodle over to comments once a bit of rep has accrued. I expect this user can make further useful comments and contributions, but his/her hands are tied at the moment. | |
Apr 8, 2016 at 13:43 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl♦ | This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review | |
S Apr 8, 2016 at 13:31 | review | Low quality posts | |||
Apr 8, 2016 at 17:05 | |||||
S Apr 8, 2016 at 13:31 | review | Late answers | |||
Apr 8, 2016 at 13:44 | |||||
Apr 8, 2016 at 13:16 | review | First posts | |||
Apr 8, 2016 at 13:20 | |||||
Apr 8, 2016 at 13:12 | history | answered | marh_g | CC BY-SA 3.0 |