Timeline for Philosophy behind cohomological representations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2016 at 6:11 | vote | accept | Makarand Sarnobat | ||
| Apr 12, 2016 at 0:55 | comment | added | Venkataramana | There is an article by Clozel in the Ann arbor conference on automorphic forms (editors: Milne and Clozel) where he talks about automorphic representations which at infinity have algebraic Langlands parameter; these are the ones where the infinity component is "cohomological" (apart from "Artin representations"). That article contains much information on why these are important. | |
| Apr 10, 2016 at 12:44 | answer | added | Dan Petersen | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 9, 2016 at 19:13 | answer | added | Jeffrey Adams | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 9, 2016 at 15:39 | comment | added | Makarand Sarnobat | Ya, agreed. Though I feel its not a bad idea to hear opinions and comments from other experts in the area, which might give different insights. Also the way to look at things might be different. So thought I would ask this here! :) | |
| Apr 9, 2016 at 11:47 | comment | added | Venkataramana | Surely your advisor Raghuram will be the right person to tell you? | |
| Apr 8, 2016 at 23:59 | history | edited | Myshkin |
+ top level tag (nt.) + automorphic forms
|
|
| Apr 8, 2016 at 23:59 | answer | added | Myshkin | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 8, 2016 at 6:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 8, 2016 at 7:39 | |||||
| Apr 8, 2016 at 6:21 | history | asked | Makarand Sarnobat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |