Timeline for Completion of an algebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016 at 12:13 | history | edited | Stefan Kohl♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added top-level tag; some language editing.
|
| Apr 7, 2016 at 11:44 | comment | added | Todd Leason | (1) I didn't suggest an algebraically closed field as base ring, I just suggest to rename the latter $R$ by $k$ or something similar to not mix it with the former $R$. (2) Could you please elaborate why you think the definitions you wrote down for $F^dR$ and $R_{[ab]}$ don't apply to $A$ in general ? | |
| Apr 7, 2016 at 11:35 | comment | added | user900000 | First, I think your suggestion about the base ring to be an algebraically closed field is interesting. Second, for your question, it's not necessary. | |
| Apr 7, 2016 at 10:26 | comment | added | Todd Leason | I suggest to not call $A$'s base ring $R$ but $k$ or something similar, because $(A,k)$ plays the role of $(R,\mathbb{C})$ at the beginning. Besides from the confusing notation, can't you apply the definition of $F^dR$ and $R_{[ab]}$ literarly to $A$ ? | |
| Apr 7, 2016 at 10:08 | history | asked | user900000 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |