Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3, 2020 at 15:39 comment added Watson Notice that $\Delta_{L}(n)^2$ is always a rational multiple of a power of $\pi$ (where $\Delta_L(n)$ denotes the best lattice sphere packing density in dimension $n$). It follows by Sawin's comment above, and by Prop 3.2.11 + 3.4.6 in Martinet's book "Perfect lattices" : an extremal lattice (i.e. achieves a local extremum of the density function) is a perfect lattice, which has to be similar to an integral lattice !
Apr 5, 2016 at 21:07 vote accept Archie
Apr 5, 2016 at 18:19 comment added usul @Suvrit, I think there is some reason grounded in group theory and having to do with the Monster (perhaps someone knowledgeable can elaborate).
Apr 5, 2016 at 18:03 answer added Yufei Zhao timeline score: 18
Apr 5, 2016 at 13:56 comment added Suvrit @StanleyYaoXiao Then there would have to be a reason that says why 24 is the final number (perhaps grounded in fixed point theory, no idea)...
Apr 5, 2016 at 11:10 comment added Stanley Yao Xiao I think it is generally believed that the optimal packing in most dimensions is not a lattice packing... in fact, dimension 24 may be the last time where the optimal packing is a lattice packing. I believe in dimension 10 it is known that the best packing is not a lattice packing
Apr 4, 2016 at 19:05 comment added Will Sawin Any integer lattice packing in dimension $n$ has a density of the form $\pi^{\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor} $ times the square root of a rational number, because of the formula for the volume of the sphere. Because the optimal packings in dimensions $1,2,3,8,24$ are integer lattices, this explains the occurrence of $\pi$.
Apr 4, 2016 at 18:58 comment added Archie Yes, apologies, now edited I hope !
Apr 4, 2016 at 18:58 history edited Archie CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body; edited title
Apr 4, 2016 at 18:48 review First posts
Apr 4, 2016 at 18:52
Apr 4, 2016 at 18:48 history asked Archie CC BY-SA 3.0