Timeline for $RO(G)$-graded homotopy groups vs. Mackey functors

9 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Apr 6, 2016 at 8:26	history	edited	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0	Expanded argument to clarify dependence on rationals.
Apr 5, 2016 at 11:11	comment	added	Justin Noel		@AaronMazel-Gee: Sorry, that was less than clear because I rushed the answer. I filled out the answer a bit more. Hopefully, it is more understandable now.
Apr 5, 2016 at 11:10	history	edited	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0	Added a couple paragraphs of clarifying information and additional information for equivariant $K$-theory.
Apr 5, 2016 at 11:03	history	edited	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0	Added a couple paragraphs of clarifying information and additional information for equivariant $K$-theory.
Apr 5, 2016 at 10:58	history	edited	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 1867 characters in body
Apr 5, 2016 at 3:54	comment	added	Aaron Mazel-Gee		Thanks Justin! This is very helpful. I have a few questions. (1) When you say "i.e., $g$ is a $G$-equivalence", do you mean to say "$g$ is an isomorphism on $RO(G)$-graded homotopy"? (2) How can I see that $H\mathbb{Q}_*(S^V)=0$ for all $V$ iff $p>2$? (3) What do you mean by $JO(G)$, is this maybe supposed to be $RO(J)$?
Apr 4, 2016 at 14:15	history	edited	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0	Need suspensions to get that C_f is closed under suspension.
Apr 4, 2016 at 11:10	history	edited	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0	deleted 41 characters in body
Apr 4, 2016 at 10:34	history	answered	Justin Noel	CC BY-SA 3.0