Timeline for Precise estimate for probability an $n$-point set has diameter smaller than $1$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 22, 2020 at 20:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 23, 2020 at 19:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 24, 2019 at 18:55 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 24, 2019 at 16:59 | history | edited | Will Sawin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Dec 24, 2019 at 16:59 | comment | added | Will Sawin | @D_809 Yes, sounds right. | |
Dec 24, 2019 at 13:01 | comment | added | D_809 | @WillSawin: Should $<1$ in the denominator be $<1/2$? | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Apr 6, 2016 at 0:24 | comment | added | Will Sawin | @DouglasZare I'm primarily interested in the case when $d$ is fixed and $n$ is increasing. I also expect this to be the easiest case. | |
Apr 5, 2016 at 22:51 | comment | added | Douglas Zare | You have two variables, $n$ and $d$. Are you interested in knowing what happens if you fix $d$ and let $n$ increase? If you want both $n$ and $d$ to increase, how quickly relative to each other? | |
Apr 4, 2016 at 0:39 | history | asked | Will Sawin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |