Timeline for Is the Dieudonne module actually a cohomology group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 4, 2016 at 0:46 | comment | added | Jesse Silliman | Doesn't Mazur-Messing interpret the Dieudonne module of a p-divisible group G as rigidified extensions? This suggests that defining a category of G-invariant D-modules should be possible. I would naively guess that the resulting cohomology would be "generated in degree 1", just as for abelian varieties, though. | |
| Apr 3, 2016 at 20:46 | comment | added | Will Sawin | One wants not a site on $X$ but a site whose "fundamental group" is in some way "dual" to $X$. The simplest picture of this seems like it should be the quotient of a point by the Cartier dual of $X$. | |
| Apr 3, 2016 at 17:01 | history | edited | Stefan Kohl♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed some typos.
|
| Apr 3, 2016 at 13:01 | history | edited | Alex Youcis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 140 characters in body
|
| Apr 3, 2016 at 12:24 | history | asked | Alex Youcis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |