Timeline for Stronger form of connectedness than path-connectedness
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 at 6:47 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | Thanks @Gro-Tsen - will think about it and post a new question in a week or so | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 15:06 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | @DominicvanderZypen: I'll rather let you do that, but I suggest you give the matter further thought to decide what the best question should be, because it's not entirely clear. You probably want to require $C$ to be $(C,c_0,c_1)$-connected and $c_0$ and $c_1$ (hence any two points) to be connected by a path and sprinkle some magic "Hausdorff" dust in various places, but I'm not sure what else. | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 15:00 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | @SimonHenry: There are still the indiscrete spaces, but you're right, it's even worse than I thought. | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 14:59 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | @Gro-Tsen very good point, can you ask the question with your additional requirement? | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 14:49 | vote | accept | Dominic van der Zypen | ||
| Mar 31, 2016 at 14:41 | comment | added | Simon Henry | With regard to your last remarks: In fact it would already be nice to have an example where $C$-connectedness is a non trivial notion with (i.e. there is as least one non trivial space that is $C$-connected) | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 12:48 | history | answered | Gro-Tsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |