Timeline for Quasi-coherator
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2016 at 17:56 | comment | added | Sam | Thanks! I was actually studying quasi-coherator from Thomason-Trobaugh. However, it doesn't give any idea about coherator on sites. I just thought perhaps some of you know a source where the generalization is done. Now I am trying to generalize it myself. But you see unlike schemes there is no concept of affine cover on a site ! And the way Thomason-Trobaugh has constructed the coherator, uses affine cover. So may be I have to find some sort of replacement. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 17:39 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Mar 26, 2016 at 13:49 | comment | added | Jason Starr | @Sam. To steal a suggestion from Remy van Dobben de Bruyn: why not write up carefully a generalization to sites and then contribute that to the Stacks Project? | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 12:25 | comment | added | Jason Starr | @pbelmans. That was my mistake. What the OP calls the quasi-coherator seems to be what everybody else calls the coherator. Anyway, Thomason-Trobaugh is the primary source. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 12:19 | comment | added | Jason Starr | @pbelmans. I think that tag in the Stacks Project is discussing the coherator, not the quasi-coherator. The primary reference is Appendix B of Thomason-Trobaugh. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 10:45 | comment | added | pbelmans | Regarding question 1: it works in general, see stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/077P. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 10:12 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 26, 2016 at 10:14 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2016 at 10:10 | history | asked | Sam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |