Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 28, 2017 at 22:06 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Dec 28, 2017 at 21:34 history edited YCor
edited tags
Dec 28, 2017 at 21:21 history edited François G. Dorais
edited tags
Apr 11, 2016 at 20:15 vote accept Asaf Shachar
Apr 11, 2016 at 18:45 history edited Ben McKay CC BY-SA 3.0
spelling
Apr 11, 2016 at 18:14 answer added Arturo Magidin timeline score: 10
Mar 24, 2016 at 23:37 comment added Arturo Magidin So... should this be written up as a formal answer?
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:23 comment added Emil Jeřábek For the additive group, an argument easier to check is that for any $d\ge1$, there are real algebraic numbers $\alpha$ of degree $d$ (such as $2^{1/d}$), in which case $\{1,\alpha,\dots,\alpha^{d-1}\}$ is linearly independent.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:22 history edited Arturo Magidin CC BY-SA 3.0
it was unclear that the final paragraph was connected to the prior one; easy to miss the ":". better this way.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:17 comment added Arturo Magidin @S.Carnahan: Yes, you're right. The additive group is of course infinite dimensional: for example, $\{\sqrt{p}\mid p\text{ is prime}\}$ is (additively) independent over $\mathbb{Q}$. As for the multiplicative group, the primes themselves are independent.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:11 comment added Emil Jeřábek Now wait a minute, I somehow lost “algebraic” along the way—the groups are in fact countable. So, there is actually some work to do to show they have the same dimension (namely, countably infinite). This should be easy.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:10 comment added S. Carnahan @ArturoMagidin I think cardinality is not quite enough in the countable case. Perhaps the existence of an infinite set of independent elements would help.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:06 comment added Emil Jeřábek Wow, that was close.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:04 comment added Arturo Magidin @EmilJeřábek: snap!
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:04 comment added Arturo Magidin They are both torsionfree abelian divisible groups, so they are both isomorphic to a direct sum of copies of $\mathbb{Q}$; since they have the same cardinality, they have to be isomorphic.
Mar 24, 2016 at 16:04 comment added Emil Jeřábek Yes, since the theory of divisible torsion-free abelian groups (aka $\mathbb Q$-linear spaces) is uncountably categorical.
Mar 24, 2016 at 15:52 history asked Asaf Shachar CC BY-SA 3.0