Timeline for Sequentiality of largest vector topology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2016 at 10:51 | vote | accept | red_alert | ||
| Mar 25, 2016 at 18:30 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | Ah, OK, I am sorry. | |
| Mar 25, 2016 at 17:52 | comment | added | red_alert | @SergeiAkbarov The theorem claims that the finite topology of uncountable vector space is not a vector topology. | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 21:09 | answer | added | Taras Banakh | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 15:45 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | It seems to me I saw something similar here: link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01234921 Perhaps, this will help. | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 5:29 | comment | added | red_alert | @SergeiAkbarov The topology is called vector if operations of addition and multiplication are continious. | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 5:28 | comment | added | red_alert | @AlexDegtyarev Largest vector topology on a vector space is a supremum of set of all vector topologies on it. | |
| Mar 23, 2016 at 18:37 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | What do you mean by "vector topology"? | |
| Mar 23, 2016 at 13:45 | comment | added | Loïc Teyssier | You should keep to a single identity really. Please consider registering. And addressing the earlier comment. | |
| S Mar 23, 2016 at 13:42 | history | suggested | red_alert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Largest vector topology definition
|
| Mar 23, 2016 at 13:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 23, 2016 at 13:42 | |||||
| Mar 23, 2016 at 12:48 | comment | added | Alex Degtyarev | It would help if you explained more precisely what topology you're speaking about. | |
| Mar 23, 2016 at 12:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 23, 2016 at 12:48 | |||||
| Mar 23, 2016 at 12:14 | history | asked | red_alert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |