Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 26, 2016 at 15:02 history edited Fedor Petrov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 25 characters in body
Mar 26, 2016 at 8:07 comment added Fedor Petrov Sometimes it does work. I do not understand which specific polynomial do you consider for large $n$. Antisymmetrization is your $\alpha (f)$.
Mar 26, 2016 at 7:52 comment added user173856 Fedor Petrov: Thanks for your answer! But I think your method is not suitable for big $n$. Do you still have any method to deal with similar problems when $n$ is big? By the way, is the conception "antisymmetrization" for a polynomial you mentioned above a defined mathematical concept?
Mar 26, 2016 at 7:25 vote accept user173856
Mar 22, 2016 at 17:54 comment added Fedor Petrov @Denis In other words, you mention cyclic invariance, but really there is dihedral $D_5$-invariance, and up to this invariance there is unique non-zero summand.
Mar 22, 2016 at 16:04 comment added Fedor Petrov of course, these are the same cycle 10234 in two orders, totally 10 summands
Mar 22, 2016 at 15:56 comment added Denis Serre Nice idea. I wish however bring a correction. After the remark that we may always restrict to permutations fixing $0$, because of the cyclic invariance of $f$, there remains two permutations $\pi$ for with $g^\pi$ does not vanish at the point $(0,1,2,3,4)$, namely the transposition $(24)$ and the $4$-cycle $(1,2,3,4)$. Fortunately, they give the same contribution, with the same signature.
Mar 22, 2016 at 14:58 history answered Fedor Petrov CC BY-SA 3.0