Timeline for Self-complementary block designs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| S Apr 20, 2016 at 2:56 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I added a link to a related question.
|
| Apr 20, 2016 at 1:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 20, 2016 at 2:56 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2016 at 23:35 | history | edited | Dima Pasechnik |
more tags
|
|
| Mar 20, 2016 at 16:10 | answer | added | Chris Godsil | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 2:07 | comment | added | James Propp | Yes, Dima's surmise about the intended meaning of "self-complementary" is correct. | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 20:03 | answer | added | Dima Pasechnik | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 19:17 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | I presume by self-complementarity you mean that the complement of each block is a block itself. (Like in the design of hyperplanes of an affine space over $\mathbb{F}_2$.) | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 18:25 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | Please clarify what exactly you mean by "self-complementary". That the design admits a polarity? Or is isomorphic to the dual (this would be the usual meaning of self-complementary)? Or something else? Or you just mean to say that the block size is half the number of points? | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 17:16 | history | asked | James Propp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |