Timeline for Dao's theorem on six circumcenters associated with a cyclic hexagon
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
41 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2022 at 6:35 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited tags
|
| Feb 17, 2022 at 17:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 20, 2021 at 16:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 22, 2021 at 15:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 23, 2021 at 14:07 | answer | added | Đào Thanh Oai | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 10:27 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 418 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 1:20 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 33 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2016 at 3:47 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 9:26 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 9:16 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 80 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 8:48 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 8:34 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | Use "edit" below your post. You should probably concentrate on the core problem and notation, and keep the mention of Duong's paper for more context. | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 8:27 | comment | added | Oai Thanh Đào | I thank to You, How I can do it? @BenoîtKloeckner | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 8:25 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 8:21 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | You should make clearer that the text is copied and pasted from the first quoted article (e.g. use > or " " to mark quotation). In fact, it would be better and clearer to restate the question in your own words. | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 8:06 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 384 characters in body
|
| S Apr 20, 2016 at 6:26 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 20, 2016 at 6:26 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 17, 2016 at 16:18 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | @OaiThanhĐào : one never says "I thank to you..."; it's just "Thank you...". | |
| Apr 12, 2016 at 8:53 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 46 characters in body
|
| S Apr 12, 2016 at 4:34 | history | bounty started | Oai Thanh Đào | ||
| S Apr 12, 2016 at 4:34 | history | notice added | Oai Thanh Đào | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Apr 11, 2016 at 14:31 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 252 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2016 at 5:00 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2016 at 3:02 | comment | added | Tom Copeland | Sorry, even my last comment is full of idioms difficult for most Asians to understand. | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 2:35 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2016 at 0:49 | comment | added | Oai Thanh Đào | I thank to You dear Mister @JonBannon | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 0:49 | comment | added | Oai Thanh Đào | I thank to You dear Mister @TomCopeland | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 0:42 | comment | added | Tom Copeland | Oai, it's just a matter of translation. Most Americans don't understand how difficult it can be for non-native English speakers to express their sentiments in English and often jump to the wrong conclusion. Hard to explain. Don't worry about it. | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 0:32 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | @ Oai Thanh Dao: Yes you should have posted the question. Both Tom and I are trying to help you with a tricky part of English for mathematicians. Please see Tom's suggestion for language: "I published a theorem illustrating the remarkable / beautiful connections between ..." | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 0:12 | comment | added | Oai Thanh Đào | @TomCopeland, I removed word "remarkable" ; because I understand remarkable mean: to deverse note. | |
| Mar 20, 2016 at 0:05 | comment | added | Oai Thanh Đào | Yes, I have one question-the problem 1, Ngo Quang Dương have one-the problem 2. Did you mean I souldn't posted my original question? @TomCopeland | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 23:58 | comment | added | Tom Copeland | @Oai, OP = original poster = the original author of the question = you | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 23:49 | comment | added | Oai Thanh Đào | Dear @TomCopeland OP mean? | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 23:36 | comment | added | Tom Copeland | @Jon, I'm sure that's exactly the sentiment the OP intended to convey. | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 21:09 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | @Tom: You are right! The wording you suggest is just fine. Thanks for providing a positive suggestion! | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 21:04 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2016 at 18:16 | comment | added | Tom Copeland | @Jon, cut her some slack. Most foreign speakers aren't familiar with linguistic etiquette in English--how to assume the proper tone. "I published a theorem illustrating the remarkable / beautiful connections between ..." would be perfectly acceptable. | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 17:52 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | Would O.T. Dao be the OP? If so, from one mathematician to another: Don't refer to your own theorems as `remarkable', even if they are! | |
| Mar 19, 2016 at 17:35 | history | edited | Oai Thanh Đào |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 19, 2016 at 17:06 | history | asked | Oai Thanh Đào | CC BY-SA 3.0 |