Skip to main content
formatting
Source Link
Thomas Richard
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 39

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

It seems to me that the end of the proof of the almost splitting could be made easier to follow by explicitly using the lemma I am statin below, however I had no luck trying to come up with a proof so far.

The lemma that I would like to use (in a simplified version) is the following :

Lemma :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\subset\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

Note : The real lemma I need is stated in terms of functions defined on balls in a Riemannian manifold with $\mathrm{Ric}\geq -\eta g$. I chose to state it for function in $\mathbb{R}^n$ because the heart of the difficulty remains in this setting, and it may look more appealing to PDE specialists not too fond of differential geometry.:

  • the heart of the difficulty remains in this setting.
  • it may look more appealing to PDE specialists not too fond of differential geometry.

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

It seems to me that the end of the proof of the almost splitting could be made easier to follow by explicitly using the lemma I am statin below, however I had no luck trying to come up with a proof so far.

The lemma that I would like to use (in a simplified version) is the following :

Lemma :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\subset\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

Note : The real lemma I need is stated in terms of functions defined on balls in a Riemannian manifold with $\mathrm{Ric}\geq -\eta g$. I chose to state it for function in $\mathbb{R}^n$ because the heart of the difficulty remains in this setting, and it may look more appealing to PDE specialists not too fond of differential geometry.

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

It seems to me that the end of the proof of the almost splitting could be made easier to follow by explicitly using the lemma I am statin below, however I had no luck trying to come up with a proof so far.

The lemma that I would like to use (in a simplified version) is the following :

Lemma :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\subset\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

Note : The real lemma I need is stated in terms of functions defined on balls in a Riemannian manifold with $\mathrm{Ric}\geq -\eta g$. I chose to state it for function in $\mathbb{R}^n$ because :

  • the heart of the difficulty remains in this setting.
  • it may look more appealing to PDE specialists not too fond of differential geometry.
Added some context, fixed some typos.
Source Link
Thomas Richard
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 39

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

It seems to me that the end of the proof of the almost splitting could be made easier to follow by explicitly using the lemma I am statin below, however I had no luck trying to come up with a proof so far.

The lemma that I would like to know ifuse (in a simplified version) is the following statement is true :

Lemma :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\to\mathbb{R}$$u:B(0,2)\subset\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set forof $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

Note : The real lemma I need is stated in terms of functions defined on balls in a Riemannian manifold with $\mathrm{Ric}\geq -\eta g$. I chose to state it for function in $\mathbb{R}^n$ because the heart of the difficulty remains in this setting, and it may look more appealing to PDE specialists not too fond of differential geometry.

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

I would like to know if the following statement is true :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set for $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

It seems to me that the end of the proof of the almost splitting could be made easier to follow by explicitly using the lemma I am statin below, however I had no luck trying to come up with a proof so far.

The lemma that I would like to use (in a simplified version) is the following :

Lemma :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\subset\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

Note : The real lemma I need is stated in terms of functions defined on balls in a Riemannian manifold with $\mathrm{Ric}\geq -\eta g$. I chose to state it for function in $\mathbb{R}^n$ because the heart of the difficulty remains in this setting, and it may look more appealing to PDE specialists not too fond of differential geometry.

improved formatting, added some details on notations
Source Link
Thomas Richard
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 39

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

I would like to know if the following statement is true :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set for $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\left | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\right|>\varepsilon$$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

I would like to know if the following is true :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set for $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\left | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\right|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

While reading about the almost-splitting theorem of Cheeger and Colding, I thought about the following question, which asks about wether the level sets of a function which is close to being a linear form in an average sense behave like the level sets of a linear form.

I would like to know if the following statement is true :

For any $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\eta>0$ such that if $u:B(0,2)\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function with :

  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left||\nabla u|^2-1\right|\leq\eta$,
  • $\int_{B(0,2)}\left|\mathrm{Hess}\, u\right|^2\leq\eta$,

then the set for $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ for which

$\Big | |u(y)-u(x)|-d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)\Big|>\varepsilon$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$. Here $d\left(y,\{u=u(x)\}\right)= \inf\Big\{d(z,y)\,\Big |\, z\in B(0,R),\,u(z)=u(x)\Big\}$.

I know how to prove it if the $L^2$ bounds are replaced with $L^\infty$ bounds. I also know how to prove that the set of $(x,y)\in B(0,1)\times B(0,1)$ such that

$\left |u(y)-u(x)-\langle\nabla u(x),y-x\rangle\right|\geq \varepsilon\|y-x\|$

has measure less than $\varepsilon$ provided $\eta$ is small enough.

If needed, feel free to assume the integral bounds on balls bigger than $B(0,2)$.

edited tags
Link
Thomas Richard
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 39
Loading
Source Link
Thomas Richard
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 39
Loading