Timeline for Does X(13) have potentially good reduction at 13?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2016 at 6:54 | comment | added | naf | The stable reduction of all $X(p)$ has been worked out by Bouw and Wewers in their paper "Stable reduction of modular curves". In particular, it also follows from their results that $X(13)$ does not have potentially good reduction. | |
| Mar 18, 2016 at 13:57 | vote | accept | Will Sawin | ||
| Mar 17, 2016 at 20:58 | answer | added | Ariyan Javanpeykar | timeline score: 12 | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 19:55 | answer | added | Michael Stoll | timeline score: 15 | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 5:51 | history | edited | Will Sawin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 122 characters in body
|
| Mar 16, 2016 at 19:02 | answer | added | znt | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 16, 2016 at 18:48 | comment | added | François Brunault | The Jacobian $J(13)$ admits as a factor $J_0(169)^+$, which is a 3-dimensional variety isogenous to $A_f$, where $f \in S_2(\Gamma_0(169))^+$ is a newform with coefficients in $\mathbf{Q}(\zeta_7)^+$. Does this $A_f$ have potential good reduction at $13$? | |
| Mar 16, 2016 at 16:03 | history | asked | Will Sawin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |