Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13, 2016 at 21:52 review Reopen votes
Mar 13, 2016 at 22:40
Mar 13, 2016 at 16:18 history edited user9072
edited tags
Mar 10, 2016 at 17:55 comment added Georg Lehner @SebastianGoette : What I meant was that ringed spaces (or more generally ringed toposes) are just the right generalization to make sense of the phrase "being locally isomorphic to". Any fixed locally ringed space gives you a notion of "manifolds" modeled on that space.
Mar 10, 2016 at 17:42 comment added dingakur prejamangokur @DaveLRenfro what can i say, you got me
Mar 10, 2016 at 17:36 comment added Dave L Renfro See the nearly identically worded mathematics stackexchange question does there exist a generalization of manifold, which was asked 15 hours before this math overflow question was asked.
Mar 10, 2016 at 17:07 history closed Daniel Loughran
paul garrett
Wolfgang
Stefan Kohl
Franz Lemmermeyer
Not suitable for this site
Mar 10, 2016 at 16:32 comment added Sebastian Goette Could you specify which kind of local model you are thinking about? Topological spaces with particular properties (e.g., Cantor sets), algebraically defined spaces, or maybe Banach spaces? The way the question is currently phrased, it looks too broad for a clear answer. @GeorgLehner I don't think that ringed spaces are the only or the obvious solution here. Typically, you get a huge class of local models (e.g., all affine varieties if you are doing algebraic geometry) instead of "one specified space". Or, you need a severe restriction on the admissible rings.
Mar 10, 2016 at 16:01 comment added Georg Lehner Yes - the right term to use is that of a ringed space. But this question is better suited for math.stackexchange
Mar 10, 2016 at 15:58 review Close votes
Mar 10, 2016 at 17:07
Mar 10, 2016 at 15:43 review First posts
Mar 10, 2016 at 15:48
Mar 10, 2016 at 15:39 history asked dingakur prejamangokur CC BY-SA 3.0