Timeline for How to compute irreducible representation of Lie algebra in the framework of BBD
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2011 at 19:46 | answer | added | S Kitchen | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 3, 2010 at 17:28 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | Maybe he also wants to use perverse sheaves, in which cae, we needs D for "Deligne". | |
| May 3, 2010 at 14:34 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | You should replace D-mod(G/B) with $\lambda$-monodromic differential operators, or weakly $\lambda$-equivariant D-modules on G/N. Also, I may be missing out on recent progress, but I think you should specify that G is semisimple and $\lambda$ is a regular dominant weight. Finally, I don't see why the D appears in BBD. | |
| May 3, 2010 at 13:12 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 3, 2010 at 12:50 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys |
Your initial formulation of an "equivalence" has no role for $\lambda$ on the left side, so needs some modification. It helps here to cite a particular source.
|
|
| May 3, 2010 at 7:41 | history | edited | Shizhuo Zhang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 332 characters in body; added 90 characters in body
|
| May 3, 2010 at 7:04 | answer | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 3, 2010 at 6:32 | history | asked | Shizhuo Zhang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |