Skip to main content
Notice removed Improve details by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Improve details by Dubious
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Dubious
added 5 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Dubious
  • 1.2k
  • 8
  • 14

about About complete residues on curves

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$$K=K(X)$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,f})$ where: $a_{-1,f}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

EDIT: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following way: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

about residues on curves

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,f})$ where: $a_{-1,f}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

EDIT: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following way: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

About complete residues on curves

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K=K(X)$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,f})$ where: $a_{-1,f}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

EDIT: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following way: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Dubious
  • 1.2k
  • 8
  • 14

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{f,-1})$$\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,f})$ where: $a_{f,-1}$$a_{-1,f}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$$\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

EditEDIT: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following way: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$$\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{f,-1})$ where: $a_{f,-1}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

Edit: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,f})$ where: $a_{-1,f}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

EDIT: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following way: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{-1,g})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

added 146 characters in body
Source Link
Dubious
  • 1.2k
  • 8
  • 14

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{f,-1})$ where: $a_{f,-1}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

Edit: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{f,-1})$ where: $a_{f,-1}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

Edit: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$?

Preliminaries: Let $X$ be a projective smooth curve (scheme of finite type, integral and of dimension $1$) over a perfect field $F$. Let $K$ be the function field of $X$ and for a closed point $P$ let $K_P$ be the completion of $K$ with respect to the discrete valuation $v_P$ at $\mathcal O_{X,P}$.

By following "Tate - differential and residues on curves" one can define in a very abstract way the residue at a closed point $P$ as a map:

$$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K|F}\rightarrow F$$ and moreover it is not difficult to prove the following properties :

  1. Since $F$ is perfect, $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ has dimension $1$ over $K$. Therefore by chosing an uniformizer parameter $t\in\mathcal O_{X,P}$ for $v_P$ it is possible to write every non-zero differential form as $\omega=fdt$ where $f\in K^\times$

  2. Let $\omega=fdt$, then $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{f,-1})$ where: $a_{f,-1}$ is the coefficient of $t^{-1}$ in the expansion of $f$ as Laurent power series and $k(P)$ is the residue field at $P$.


Is it possible to define a (complete) residue map: $$\text{res}_P:\Omega^1_{K_P|F}\rightarrow F$$

such that the properties $1.$ and $2.$ hold? I'd like to have a representation $\omega=gdt$ with $g\in K_P$ and $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$.

It seems that the key point is that $\Omega^1_{K|F}$ is one dimensional, but what about $\Omega^1_{K_P|F}$?

Edit: As a comment suggests, it should be better to work with $\Omega:=K_P\otimes_K\Omega^1_{K|F}$, so my question can be modified in the following: Is it possible to extend $\text{res}_P$ on $\Omega$ in order to obtain the property 2. for the elements of the form $gdt$ with $g\in K_P$? One could define directly $\text{res}_P(\omega)=\text{Tr}_{k(P)|F}(a_{g,-1})$ but now I'm not sure about the independence from the choice of $t$.

added 296 characters in body
Source Link
Dubious
  • 1.2k
  • 8
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
Dubious
  • 1.2k
  • 8
  • 14
Loading