Timeline for Uniqueness of decomposition for a slicing of triangulated category
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2020 at 23:05 | comment | added | Andrés Ibáñez Núñez | I think there is a problem with the 0 object. Bridgeland says that the $\mathcal P (\phi)$'s are full additive subcategories. In particular they have a zero object. He really means additive, and not preadditive, as can be observed in the proof of Lemma 5.2 in the article. Nevertheless this seems easy to fix, just asking objects to be nonzero in the relevant axioms. | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 18:07 | comment | added | Sasha | I used your link (bottom of page 2). | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 17:55 | comment | added | Xuqiang QIN | Thanks for the great answer. One follow up: it seems you are using a different reference for the def of slicing than me( I noticed the difference in the indices, but of course the main contents of the def are the same), would you be able to share a link of it with me so that I can compare them? | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 17:50 | vote | accept | Xuqiang QIN | ||
| Feb 29, 2016 at 17:17 | history | answered | Sasha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |