Timeline for Identity with Ramanujan's generalized continued fraction
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 at 1:56 | comment | added | Nicco | @Adam Gyenge :Perhaps this post is in the spirit of your question | |
| Feb 27, 2016 at 17:27 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 25, 2016 at 21:43 | comment | added | Adam Gyenge | Max, -1 is not essential. | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 6:47 | history | edited | Alexey Ustinov |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 24, 2016 at 20:51 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | Why is it essential to have $-1$ is the last expression? Won't "1+nice formula" be a nice formula itself? | |
| Feb 24, 2016 at 17:28 | history | edited | Adam Gyenge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Feb 24, 2016 at 16:34 | comment | added | Mark Fischler | Excuse my notational ignorance, but in the opening statement, what is the meaning of $(q)_n$? And in the definition of $H(x)$, it appears that $q$ is a numerical parameter; in that case, why is $H(x)$ not called $H(x,q)$ or possibly $H(x;q)$? | |
| Feb 24, 2016 at 16:31 | comment | added | Mark Fischler | Excuse my notational ignorance but in the opening statement, what do you mean by $(q)_n$? And, in the definition of $H(x)$, $q$ looks like an ordinary parameter; in that case, why did you not call this $H(x,q)$ or something like $H(x;q)$? | |
| S Feb 24, 2016 at 2:08 | history | suggested | JMP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
frac to dfrac for red and formatting
|
| Feb 24, 2016 at 1:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 24, 2016 at 2:08 | |||||
| Feb 23, 2016 at 18:29 | history | asked | Adam Gyenge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |