Timeline for Comparing a Chevalley basis with the canonical basis of the adjoint module?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2016 at 13:53 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | By the way, Lusztig has just posted a short paper containing his older results: front.math.ucdavis.edu/1602.07276 | |
| Feb 17, 2016 at 0:24 | vote | accept | Jim Humphreys | ||
| Feb 17, 2016 at 0:24 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @bummi: Some links are unstable, but so far the arXiv has been very stable. I agree that links to items posted on homepages are not guaranteed to be reliable over time, but the arXiv seems to work well. | |
| Feb 17, 2016 at 0:22 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Meinolf: This is very helpful, since Lusztig himself doesn't often pause to spell out the applications of his ideas. It's hard to keep up with his output! | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 8:36 | comment | added | bummi | While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 7:04 | review | Late answers | |||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 7:16 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 6:48 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 7:35 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 6:45 | history | answered | Meinolf Geck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |