Timeline for Can we do better than zero padding of FFT?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | Tom Copeland | The zero-padding gives a faithful sinc-function-type interpolation of the DFT. I think Bracewell in The Fourier Transform and Its Applications pretty much covers the theory. Dealing with distortions of the PSD from aliasing induced by noise as well as achieving super-resolution of an undersampled signal are other matters. | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 23:27 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | With all respect to the OP, can someone rewrite the question into more standard mathematical terminology so that we can tell what it is about? | |
| S Feb 9, 2016 at 22:46 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added tag. Added paragraph break.
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 22:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 9, 2016 at 22:46 | |||||
| Feb 9, 2016 at 22:18 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 10, 2016 at 4:46 | |||||
| Feb 9, 2016 at 20:09 | history | asked | Creator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |