Timeline for Solutions of equations characterizing a complex structure
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2016 at 13:07 | comment | added | Amir Baghban | @RobertBryant Dear Professor Bryant, I would like to know the characterizing of the integrable isotropic almost complex structures with respect to holomorphic hyperplanes. Can I ask it in a new question? | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 16:53 | comment | added | Robert Bryant | @Baghban: You are right that there were also typos in the formulae for $\mathrm{d}\zeta_k$. I have fixed those now; they did not affect the argument. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 16:52 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected more typos in the formulae for d(zeta_k) and the following line.
|
| Oct 12, 2016 at 15:40 | comment | added | Amir Baghban | @RobertBryant Thank you so much. Dear Professor Bryant, I would be grateful if you could check the formula of $\mathrm{d}\zeta_k$. Unfortunately, I got a non-similar formula for that. $\mathrm{d}\zeta_k= \zeta_j \wedge \omega _{kj} -(v_s\omega _s +\mathrm{d}z)\wedge \omega _k$. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 11:51 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected two typos at the request of the OP
|
| Oct 12, 2016 at 11:48 | comment | added | Robert Bryant | @Baghban: Oh, sorry, there is a typo in that formula; the term $e_k+v_k\,e_0$ should have been $e_k+(v_k/z)\,e_0$. I have edited the answer to correct the typo (and a following typo in a line below that). | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 8:41 | comment | added | Amir Baghban | @RobertBryant Dear Professor Bryant, could you please write the calculation of $\mathrm{d}\Phi_z = -e_0\,\tfrac{1}{2z}\,\mathrm{d}(z^2{+}{v_1}^2{+}\cdots{+}{v_n}^2) + (e_k{+}v_k\,e_0)\,\zeta_k\, $ in more details? I can not get what you have wrote before. | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 10:37 | vote | accept | Amir Baghban | ||
| Feb 21, 2016 at 12:01 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed some typos, added Remark 3 about a wider context for the problem.
|
| Feb 20, 2016 at 11:43 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed some notational problems in the definition of z in terms of alpha, beta, and gamma caused by others' editing of my answer.
|
| S Feb 18, 2016 at 14:02 | history | suggested | Amir Baghban | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The characterizing of $J_{\delta ,\beta}$ by $\eta$ and $\omega$ was wrong
|
| Feb 18, 2016 at 13:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 18, 2016 at 14:02 | |||||
| Feb 15, 2016 at 20:46 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some detail and made explicit the assumption n>1 in the Proposition (which I had been implicitly assuming but didn't point out until now)
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 15:31 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a proof of the Proposition and corrected a sign mistake in the original text.
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 15:08 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Dear Professor Bryant: the OP says s/he is unable to comment, so s/he added some questions for you at the end of his/her post. | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 10:01 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a remark about the larger inherent symmetry group of the problem
|
| Feb 10, 2016 at 10:04 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some explanatory sentences for the benefit of the reader.
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 20:01 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed some notation to clarify the exposition
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 17:14 | history | edited | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a missing phrase to the Proposition.
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 14:54 | history | answered | Robert Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |