Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 31, 2016 at 12:40 comment added Amir Baghban @RobertBryant Dear Prof. Bryant, I get more than what I expected and I am grateful for your complete answers and explanations.
Mar 31, 2016 at 10:37 vote accept Amir Baghban
Feb 20, 2016 at 12:25 history edited Robert Bryant CC BY-SA 3.0
Rearranged the question a bit for clarity and fixed the incorrect equations specifying integrability.
Feb 20, 2016 at 4:11 comment added Robert Bryant @Solar: You have improved your question because now you are correctly stating that the number of (real) equations on $z$ is $2n$ instead of $3n$, but you still don't have them right because, for example, $z = i$ satisfies your equations, but the corresponding almost complex structure $J_{1,0}$ is not integrable. You seem to be having problems working things out in coordinates. Perhaps you are confusing projective coordinates (which carry geodesics to straight lines) with conformal coordinates. Would you like me to try editing it?
S Feb 19, 2016 at 16:09 history suggested Amir Baghban CC BY-SA 3.0
According to the Prof. Bryant's explanations in a mail, the equations were wrong and I changed them to a right equations.
Feb 19, 2016 at 15:52 review Suggested edits
S Feb 19, 2016 at 16:09
Feb 16, 2016 at 13:15 comment added Robert Bryant @Solar: By the way, I just realized and feel that I should point out that there is something wrong with your explicit equations for $u$ and $v$ in the coordinate system $(x,y)$. These are not the differential equations $(u,v)$ must satisfy in order for $J_{\delta,\beta}$ be integrable. The correct equations when $n>1$ (as I show in my answer) are $2n$ in number, but you have written down $3n$ equations, which is too many. Also, it is clearly not right for $n=1$ because, when $n=1$ all $J_{\delta,\beta}$ are integrable complex structures. You need to fix this, because it misleads readers.
Feb 15, 2016 at 15:49 comment added Robert Bryant @Solar: Answers to your questions: (1) Yes. (2) I have entered the proof as Remark 2 below. (3) Actually, for the hypersurface $Z{\cdot}Z+1 = 0$, the functions $\delta$ and $\beta$ are functions of the type you mention (i.e., they are functions of $|v|^2$). However, for the generic hyperquadric that I wrote down, they are not. This actually follows from Remark 1, since the form for $E(x,y)$ that you wrote down is not invariant under the action of the affine group of $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, but you can just take an explicit example when $n=1$ and check this directly.
S Feb 15, 2016 at 15:34 history suggested Amir Baghban CC BY-SA 3.0
Putting braces in the item 1 of the last rows, editing some typos.
Feb 15, 2016 at 15:22 review Suggested edits
S Feb 15, 2016 at 15:34
Feb 15, 2016 at 15:06 history edited Todd Trimble CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed up a mess
S Feb 15, 2016 at 14:41 history suggested Amir Baghban CC BY-SA 3.0
Regarding the answer I have the stated questions which I can't ask in my post because apparently I don't have enough points to post comments in the site.
Feb 15, 2016 at 13:50 review Suggested edits
S Feb 15, 2016 at 14:41
Feb 13, 2016 at 0:17 comment added Robert Bryant @Solar: I noticed that you have not responded to the answer that I posted. Do you need more details, have doubts or objections, etc.? Let me know and I will do my best to answer them.
Feb 11, 2016 at 10:59 history edited user9072 CC BY-SA 3.0
changed title, further improvements might make sense
Feb 9, 2016 at 14:54 answer added Robert Bryant timeline score: 11
S Feb 9, 2016 at 6:30 history suggested Amir Baghban CC BY-SA 3.0
I am the original poster and I added the necessary information to the questions
Feb 9, 2016 at 6:03 review Suggested edits
S Feb 9, 2016 at 6:30
Feb 9, 2016 at 0:07 history edited Robert Bryant
edited tags
Feb 8, 2016 at 17:01 review First posts
Feb 8, 2016 at 17:39
Feb 8, 2016 at 17:00 history asked Amir Baghban CC BY-SA 3.0