Timeline for A Künneth-Theorem version for relative singular cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 7, 2016 at 12:28 | comment | added | Bruno Stonek | You can also consult Spanier, page 249. | |
| Feb 7, 2016 at 11:35 | comment | added | Sabrina Gemsa | @Greg Friedman thank you. I will be careful. | |
| Feb 7, 2016 at 4:48 | comment | added | Greg Friedman | You should be careful. The cohomology version typically also requires some sort of finite-generation condition on the cohomology. I agree Dold is a good reference, but I think it should be to Proposition VII.7.6 for what you want. Chris's reference is, I think, missing a Roman numeral chapter number. | |
| Feb 7, 2016 at 0:45 | comment | added | Sabrina Gemsa | thanks. I will try to have look in this book as soon as possible. | |
| Feb 7, 2016 at 0:24 | comment | added | Chris Gerig | It is true, and is proven in the same way with notational changes: Corollary 12.10 of Dold's Lectures on Algebraic Topology. | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 22:53 | history | asked | Sabrina Gemsa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |