Timeline for (Partial) crepant resolutions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:44 | history | edited | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 59 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:33 | history | edited | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 498 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:32 | comment | added | Sándor Kovács | ps: if that's your question, then this is an answer, no? | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:30 | comment | added | Sándor Kovács | Of course. I was thinking something else. Sorry. | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 9:26 | comment | added | mathvader | $\mathbb{Z}_n$ acts diagonally. It is a very known fact that the orbifold above admits a crepant resolution (this is an $A_{n-1}$ singularity, so the exceptional set is a chain of $\mathbb{P}^1$'s). Now, if you consider the total space of the canonical bundle of the weighted projective line $\mathbb{P}(1,n-1)$ you have a partial crepant resolution. My question is if this is the unique partial crepant resolution. And of course, I mean that this rsolution is partial because is an intermediate resolution. | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 7:54 | history | answered | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 3.0 |