Timeline for What are the generating partitions of the odometer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2016 at 19:24 | vote | accept | Stéphane Laurent | ||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 22:12 | history | reopened |
Fedor Petrov Ian Morris Jeremy Rickard Todd Trimble |
||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 22:12 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Thank you; yes, it is better. I think I like your comment (which mentions Rokhlin's theorem) even more, and would edit in your comment myself except that I don't know the field. However, I will cast a reopening vote. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 22:09 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 22:15 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 21:50 | comment | added | Stéphane Laurent | @ToddTrimble I edited. Is it better ? | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 21:50 | history | edited | Stéphane Laurent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
| Jan 30, 2016 at 21:48 | comment | added | Stéphane Laurent | As @IanMorris says, this is completely standard. What could I do ? Not giving these standard definitions... Every ergodic measure-preserving transformation has a generating partition (Rokhlin's theorem), and it is a natural question to ask which partitions are generating. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 19:23 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I expect Ian has made a good point, but a likely counter from some of our users is that the question ought to be given some context/motivation. If this were done, then I'd think there's probably little ground for keeping it closed (and -- sayeth the broken record here -- if it is the case that you do not know the field, then please consider whether you should be the one to cast a vote to close). | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 17:23 | comment | added | Ian Morris | "Generating partition" and "dyadic odometer" are standard concepts in ergodic theory which do not in my view require explanation or exposition additional to that given in the question. The question asked about these objects is in my opinion reasonable and of an acceptable level for this forum. I do not think that this question is unclear and I see no reason for it to be closed. | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 12:44 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 16:00 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 9:42 | history | closed |
Alexey Ustinov Myshkin user1688 Franz Lemmermeyer Wolfgang |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Jan 30, 2016 at 4:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 9:42 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 0:45 | answer | added | Anthony Quas | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 29, 2016 at 23:33 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jan 30, 2016 at 7:43 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2016 at 23:13 | history | asked | Stéphane Laurent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |