Timeline for Brownian motion in $\mathbb{R}^n$, probability of hitting a set
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2016 at 21:39 | vote | accept | user85355 | ||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 21:39 | vote | accept | user85355 | ||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 21:39 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 15:02 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 14:47 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more descriptive title
|
| Jan 16, 2016 at 14:02 | vote | accept | user85355 | ||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 21:39 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:53 | comment | added | Sebastian Goette | @SergueiPopov Oops. So we would need a different condition, like some lower Hausdorff measure to be nonzero. | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:48 | answer | added | Serguei Popov | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:44 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 15:26 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:38 | comment | added | Serguei Popov | @SebastianGoette: he asked "within time $t$", not "at time $t$" | |
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:21 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2016 at 12:12 | history | asked | user85355 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |