Timeline for Reference request: normalization of intertwining operators for GL(2, C)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2016 at 17:30 | comment | added | Subhajit Jana | Why do you expect the normalized operator, as you have defined, to be nonzero? Shouldn't it have a zero at the special representations, i.e. $\chi_1\chi_2^{-1}=p^{\pm1}$? Most probably to get a non-vanishing holomorphic operator one normalizes by $\epsilon(0,\chi_1\chi_2^{-1})\frac{L(1,\chi_2\chi_1^{-1})}{L(0,\chi_1\chi_2^{-1})}.$ | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 14:37 | comment | added | Joseph Hundley | A little. I didn't come across anything GL(2) (or SL(2)) specific. It seemed like this simplest case would probably be simpler and older. | |
| Jan 9, 2016 at 14:00 | vote | accept | Joseph Hundley | ||
| Jan 8, 2016 at 17:20 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 8, 2016 at 16:59 | comment | added | user1688 | Did you consult Arthur's early papers on the trace formula? | |
| Jan 8, 2016 at 16:11 | history | asked | Joseph Hundley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |