Skip to main content
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X)I + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

There are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix. (See full details herehere). This does not work for even $n>2$ since the $SO(2)$ invariance is based on the fact that all $2$ dimensional rotations commute which is false for higher dimensions.

So for the case $\dim=2$ there are at least $5$ degrees of freedom if we consider $SO(n)$-invariance:

$\alpha(X)=a_1 \text{tr}(X)I + a_2X + a_3X^T+a_4(R_{a_5}\cdot X)$

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X)I + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

There are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix. (See full details here). This does not work for even $n>2$ since the $SO(2)$ invariance is based on the fact that all $2$ dimensional rotations commute which is false for higher dimensions.

So for the case $\dim=2$ there are at least $5$ degrees of freedom if we consider $SO(n)$-invariance:

$\alpha(X)=a_1 \text{tr}(X)I + a_2X + a_3X^T+a_4(R_{a_5}\cdot X)$

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X)I + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

There are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix. (See full details here). This does not work for even $n>2$ since the $SO(2)$ invariance is based on the fact that all $2$ dimensional rotations commute which is false for higher dimensions.

So for the case $\dim=2$ there are at least $5$ degrees of freedom if we consider $SO(n)$-invariance:

$\alpha(X)=a_1 \text{tr}(X)I + a_2X + a_3X^T+a_4(R_{a_5}\cdot X)$

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

added 277 characters in body
Source Link
Asaf Shachar
  • 6.7k
  • 2
  • 20
  • 70

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X) + bX + cX^T$$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X)I + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

That is, thereThere are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix. (See full details here). This does not work for even $n>2$ since the $SO(2)$ invariance is based on the fact that all $2$ dimensional rotations commute which is false for higher dimensions.

So for the case $\dim=2$ there are moreat least $5$ degrees of freedom in this case.if we consider $SO(n)$-invariance:

$\alpha(X)=a_1 \text{tr}(X)I + a_2X + a_3X^T+a_4(R_{a_5}\cdot X)$

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

(See full details here)

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X) + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

That is, there are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix.

So there are more degrees of freedom in this case.

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

(See full details here)

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X)I + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

There are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix. (See full details here). This does not work for even $n>2$ since the $SO(2)$ invariance is based on the fact that all $2$ dimensional rotations commute which is false for higher dimensions.

So for the case $\dim=2$ there are at least $5$ degrees of freedom if we consider $SO(n)$-invariance:

$\alpha(X)=a_1 \text{tr}(X)I + a_2X + a_3X^T+a_4(R_{a_5}\cdot X)$

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

Some further analysis, stressing complications were added.
Source Link
Asaf Shachar
  • 6.7k
  • 2
  • 20
  • 70

Heuristics for counting degrees of freedom for isotropic operators

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X) + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example [here][1]here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid) [1]:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00041995#page-1

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

That is, there are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix.

So there are more degrees of freedom in this case.

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

(See full details here)

Heuristics for counting degrees of freedom for isotropic operators

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X) + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example [here][1].

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid) [1]:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00041995#page-1

Heuristics for counting degrees of freedom

I have recently learned about the representation theorem for isotropic, linear operators, which says the following:

Defintion:

Let $M_n$ be the vector space of $n \times n$ real matrices. We say a linear operator $\alpha:M_n \to M_n$ is isotropic if:

$(*) \, \, \alpha(S^TXS)=S^T\alpha(X)S \, , \, \forall S \in O(n)$

Theorem:

Let $\alpha$ be a linear isotropic operator. Then there exists 3 real scalars $a,b,c$ such that:

$\alpha(X)=a \text{tr}(X) + bX + cX^T$

A proof is given for example here.

My question:

Is there an a priori way, to see in advance that the number of degrees of freedom left are exactly 3? Or at least that this number is independent of $n$?

Trivial Note: $\dim (\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n))=n^4, \dim O(n) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$

What I would like to see is some simple heuristic, which does not involve repeating the proof. (which is not very enlightening I am afraid)

Update:

This might be more challenging than I originally thought; I hoped for some heuristc concerning only the dimensions of $\operatorname{Hom}(M_n,M_n),O(n)$. However, any argument that will consider only these numbers will not be delicate enough to distinguish between $O(n)$-invariance and $SO(n)$-invariance.

$\dim(SO(n))=\dim(O(n))$, but if we replace the requirement for $O(n)$-invariance in $(*)$ with $SO(n)$-invariance, the theorem no longer holds (in even dimensions).

That is, there are $SO(n)$-invariant operators which are not in the above form. For example ($n=2$), take $\alpha(A)=R_{\theta} \cdot A$ where $R_{\theta}$ is a rotation matrix.

So there are more degrees of freedom in this case.

Is there a representation theorem for $SO(n)$-invariant operators? How many degrees of freedom do we have in this case?

(See full details here)

Source Link
Asaf Shachar
  • 6.7k
  • 2
  • 20
  • 70
Loading