Timeline for On convergence of convex bodies
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 4, 2017 at 11:23 | vote | accept | asv | ||
Oct 4, 2017 at 11:23 | |||||
Oct 3, 2017 at 17:34 | answer | added | Mohammad Ghomi | timeline score: 7 | |
Jan 6, 2017 at 20:47 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 7, 2016 at 20:21 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 7, 2016 at 19:34 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Oct 8, 2016 at 19:33 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 8, 2016 at 19:16 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 19:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 10, 2016 at 18:29 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 10, 2016 at 18:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 11, 2016 at 17:54 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 9, 2016 at 8:05 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | For starters, it'd be nice to solve the 3-dim case, just the first question. This should be doable in 3-dim while examples already in 3-dim show that this is not too easy. (I still believe in n-dim at least for the first question). | |
Jan 4, 2016 at 23:11 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | Indeed, the 2nd q. is delicate. | |
Jan 4, 2016 at 15:09 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Q2 seems true, but delicate. If $0$ belongs to a sharp edge of $K$ (say in 3D) , any small ball $\epsilon B$ around $0$ can be cut by a small translation of $K$, making non-contractible the intersection with $\partial (\epsilon B) $. So for sure $i(\epsilon)$ really depends on $\epsilon$. | |
Jan 4, 2016 at 14:26 | comment | added | asv | @PietroMajer: No, only $0\in \partial K$. | |
Jan 4, 2016 at 14:13 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | In Question 2 is $0\in\partial K_i$ still assumed ? | |
Jan 4, 2016 at 10:09 | comment | added | Dirk | Wlog you can assume that $K$ lies in the upper half plane. Isn't it clear that $\partial K\cap \epsilon S^{n-1}$ is the graph of a convex function for $\epsilon$ small enough, and doesn't this imply that you can contract along radial lines? | |
Jan 4, 2016 at 8:19 | answer | added | Mikhail Katz | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 3, 2016 at 16:35 | history | asked | asv | CC BY-SA 3.0 |