Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Dec 29, 2015 at 6:00 history suggested Bartek CC BY-SA 3.0
correction: chains -> maximal chains
Dec 29, 2015 at 5:36 review Suggested edits
S Dec 29, 2015 at 6:00
Dec 29, 2015 at 0:13 vote accept Bartek
Dec 28, 2015 at 22:21 comment added Asaf Karagila Which is why trees are fun, there the two notions join! :-)
Dec 28, 2015 at 22:18 comment added Joel David Hamkins I agree. But in a Boolean algebra, the usual disjointness version of antichain is a far more useful and informative notion. If one thinks that all one has is a partial order, then the other notion may seem natural (even though we set theorists are instinctively completing our partial orders to complete Boolean algebras).
Dec 28, 2015 at 20:15 comment added Asaf Karagila It is interesting to me how set theorists perceive the term "antichain" as in the context of forcing and Boolean algebras immediately, whereas most of other people think about the "usual", comparability related definition.
Dec 28, 2015 at 20:13 history edited Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0
added 581 characters in body
Dec 28, 2015 at 13:04 comment added Asaf Karagila Joel, yes, I noticed this earlier today, but I won't have time to edit my answer until later this evening. I was hoping no one will notice until then! ;-)
Dec 28, 2015 at 12:31 comment added Joel David Hamkins Asaf, just to be clear, you are also referring to the "incompatible" notion of antichain, rather than "incomparable", right?
Dec 28, 2015 at 3:00 history edited Todd Trimble CC BY-SA 3.0
persnickety change to Polish orthography (changing "Los")
Dec 27, 2015 at 23:32 history edited Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0
added 324 characters in body
Dec 27, 2015 at 23:26 history answered Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0