Timeline for Vector bundles, finitely generated projective module?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 22, 2022 at 8:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
|
|
Jan 29, 2016 at 18:57 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Dec 23, 2015 at 1:26 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1586 characters in body
|
Dec 22, 2015 at 20:11 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Agree with @Qiaochu. | |
Dec 22, 2015 at 19:06 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | @Nicola: it's not. Everything we're discussing only applies to vector bundles which are direct summands of trivial vector bundles. These are controlled in a formal categorical way by $\mathbb{R}(B)$. | |
Dec 22, 2015 at 17:56 | comment | added | Nicola Ciccoli | In the original Swan paper (which is free access ams.org/journals/tran/1962-105-02/S0002-9947-1962-0143225-6/… ) normality of the base space is used to prove that two vector bundles are isomorphic iff their modules of sections are. I failed to understand where this specific condition can be relaxed in Tychonoff (i.e. Hausdorff and completely regular). A question of some interest because I remember reading that Tychonoff is the minimal topological condition under which it is possibile to fully recover $B$ from $\mathbb R(B)$. | |
Dec 22, 2015 at 11:03 | history | answered | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |