Skip to main content
replaced http://math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
Source Link

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notesof these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com questionEric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

added 364 characters in body
Source Link
Pete L. Clark
  • 65.4k
  • 12
  • 241
  • 381

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

For a ring $R$, the space $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ -- the set of maximal ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- has two evident properties: its singleton sets are closed (i.e., the T1 separation property) and it is quasi-compact. In his thesis, M. Hochster showed that conversely any quasi-compact T1 topological space $X$ is homeomorphic to $\operatorname{MaxSpec} R$ for some commutative ring $R$.

A totally disconnected topological space is automatically T1: closures of points are connected sets! So your question reduces to one of general topology: is there a totally disconnected, quasi-compact non-Hausdorff topological space $X$? The answer is yes and indeed Eric Wofsey's answer to your earlier math.stackexchange.com question provides an example.

In summary: no, not necessarily.

Added: On the other hand, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ -- the set of prime ideals of $R$ endowed with the Zariski topology -- is T1 iff it is Hausdorff iff it is totally disconnected iff $\operatorname{Spec} R = \operatorname{MaxSpec} R$. See e.g. $\S$13.3 of these notes. Maybe this is helpful for you.

added 32 characters in body
Source Link
Pete L. Clark
  • 65.4k
  • 12
  • 241
  • 381
Loading
Source Link
Pete L. Clark
  • 65.4k
  • 12
  • 241
  • 381
Loading