Timeline for The space of positive definite orthogonal matrices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 20, 2015 at 16:06 | comment | added | Robert Bryant | Of course, it's not true that each symmetric matrix $S$ has an anti-symmetric 'partner' $A$ such that $S+A$ is orthogonal. First of all, the eigenvalues of $S$ have to lie in the interval $[-1,1]$ or no such $A$ can exist. Even this is not enough, though. You also need that the eigenvalues of $S$ other than $\pm 1$ (if any) must have even multiplicity. If those conditions are satisfied, though, it is not hard to show that an $A$ exists such that $R = S+A$ is orthogonal. | |
Dec 20, 2015 at 6:18 | comment | added | Pushpendre | For example, let $M = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 1\\1 & 2\end{bmatrix}$, then $M$ is positive definite but $A$ can be $M$ plus any anti symmetric matrix $M'$ divided by two. For example if $M' = \begin{bmatrix}0 & -1\\ -1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$ then A = $(M + M') / 2$ would not be orthogonal. Therefore, the above characterization is unsatisfactory. | |
Dec 20, 2015 at 6:05 | comment | added | Pushpendre | If the symmetric matrix $M = A + A^T$ is positive definite, then it's not necessary that $A$ would be orthogonal, right? Or is there a unique antisymmetric matrix $M'$ that when added to $M$ would create an orthogonal matrix? | |
Dec 20, 2015 at 5:56 | history | edited | Robert Israel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
Dec 20, 2015 at 5:50 | history | answered | Robert Israel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |