Timeline for What is known about $\sum_{n \leq x} \mu(n) \varphi(n)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 17, 2015 at 19:13 | history | edited | Greg Martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 11:05 | vote | accept | Jeffrey Shallit | ||
Dec 17, 2015 at 7:16 | comment | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | To get the (Z_{gamma}) independent, one probably also needs to assume linear independance of ordinates of zeros of zeta... | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:49 | history | edited | Greg Martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 2:51 | comment | added | Lucia | You might need to change your explicit formula a bit -- there'll be $1/\zeta^{\prime}(\rho)$'s in the denominator. So like with the usual partial sums of the Mobius function, this would be a bit more painful to work with than the analogs for $\psi(x)$. | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 2:36 | comment | added | Peter Humphries | See chapter 15 of Montgomery and Vaughan's book; the methods there produce sign changes for $\psi(x)$, and the same methods would show that $f(x)/x^{3/2}$ changes sign infinitely often. | |
Dec 16, 2015 at 23:04 | comment | added | Jeffrey Shallit | Great! But what can be proved, if anything, unconditionally? | |
Dec 16, 2015 at 22:12 | history | answered | Greg Martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |