Timeline for Any PL-homology-manifold is homotopy equivalent to a manifold
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:54 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | Did you check Hillman's papers on higher-dimensional spaces? | |
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:50 | comment | added | Misha | @ε-δ: You are right, I missed the assumption that the space is a PL homology manifold. Then, indeed, in dimension 3 they all are ordinary PL manifolds. | |
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:10 | comment | added | ε-δ | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homology_manifold Please correct me if I am wrong: the link of vertex in h-manifold has to be homological sphere, so if dimension is 3 it has to be 2-sphere, so it was a manifold. | |
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:05 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | @ε-δ, What do you mean by a "homology manifold"? | |
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:03 | comment | added | ε-δ | Sorry, I did not get it — are you trying to say that there is a counterexample in dimension 3? — all 3-dimensional homological PL-mainifolds are manifolds, aren't they? | |
Dec 15, 2015 at 8:00 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | @Misha, thanks for doing my work for me :-) | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 17:42 | comment | added | Misha | Indeed: The paper J. Hillman, An indecomposable PD3-complex whose fundamental group has infinitely many ends, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 138 (2005), 55–57, contains an example whose fundamental group is not isomorphic to a 3-manifold group. Somebody (C.B.Thomas?) also had an earlier example with finite fundamental group. | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 15:26 | history | answered | Mikhail Katz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |