Timeline for What is the precise relationship between o-minimal theory and Grothendieck's "Esquisse d'un programme"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 28, 2016 at 17:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 28, 2016 at 17:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 21, 2016 at 10:26 | vote | accept | Mikhail Katz | ||
| S Apr 20, 2016 at 15:31 | history | bounty started | Mikhail Katz | ||
| S Apr 20, 2016 at 15:31 | history | notice added | Mikhail Katz | Draw attention | |
| Apr 20, 2016 at 14:43 | history | edited | Mikhail Katz |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 20, 2016 at 14:42 | answer | added | ACL | timeline score: 18 | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 9:13 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | I was hoping for some more details, such as relation to semialgebraic and semianalytic sets as well as the status of current research in o-minimality with regard to the esquisse. | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 9:05 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I would simply say that definable sets in o-minimal expansions of the real number field obey the desired properties outlined in the section on tame topology in the Esquisse, and hence could be regarded as the model-theoretic response to that section of the monograph. This is enunciated clearly in van den Dries's book Tame Topology and O-minimal Structures. | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 8:18 | history | asked | Mikhail Katz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |