Timeline for How to prove Liouville measure is invariant under geodesic flow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2017 at 11:17 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | Thanks, @BenMcKay. I haven't thought about this recently and it would take too much time to correct my answer. If you think it is misleading I will delete it. Another possibility would be for you to correct it so as to remove inaccuracies since you seem to be on top of the material currently. | |
| Nov 12, 2017 at 11:14 | comment | added | Ben McKay | Arnold's proof is for the symplectic volume form on the cotangent bundle, not the induced volume form on the unit sphere bundle. Note that the volume form on the unit sphere bundle is not an invariant of the contact structure on the unit sphere bundle, so the result is not an immediate consequence of Arnold's proof. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 8, 2015 at 13:24 | history | edited | Mikhail Katz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 232 characters in body
|
| Dec 8, 2015 at 13:12 | history | answered | Mikhail Katz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |