Timeline for Request for classical articles in representation theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Dec 8, 2015 at 20:24 | history | edited | Reimundo Heluani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 976 characters in body
|
Dec 8, 2015 at 20:15 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | To reinforce what Tobias says, I'd wonder what background the students need to have. Some of the older Kostant or Steinberg papers have accessible parts but tend to be fairly long and perhaps over-dependent on prior knowledge. There is also the ubiquitous "Lang's theorem" for algebraic groups in prime characteristic; the original proof is short but set in an old-fashioned algebraic geometry language, while the later version by Steinberg is an improvment but not really modern. Lots of possible directions. | |
Dec 8, 2015 at 17:32 | answer | added | Vít Tuček | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 8, 2015 at 17:10 | answer | added | David Hill | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 8, 2015 at 15:45 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
S Dec 8, 2015 at 12:55 | history | suggested | Tadashi |
Added possibly relevant tag
|
|
Dec 8, 2015 at 12:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 8, 2015 at 12:55 | |||||
Dec 8, 2015 at 11:31 | comment | added | Tobias Kildetoft | Could you elaborate a bit on the topic you mean to cover? I mean, will it be of a mainly algebraic or geometric flavour? And how "classical" do they need to be (i.e. how to judge if a text is classic or not?). | |
Dec 8, 2015 at 10:17 | history | asked | Reimundo Heluani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |