Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Ivan Izmestiev
  • 6.3k
  • 26
  • 50

Let $M$ be a complete n dimensional Riemannian manifold. $vol$ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let $$ SM=\{(x,v)|x\in M, v\in T_xM, \|v\|=1\} $$ be the unit tangent bundle of $M$. Then $SM$ will be equipped with the Liouville measure $\nu$. Given a subset $A=(U,A_x)\subset SM$, where $U\subset M$ is a subset of $M$, $A_x$ is a subset of the unit ballsphere of the tangent space at $x\in U$, $\nu$ is defined by $$ v(A)=\int_U \int_{A_x} dS^{n-1} dvol(x) $$ where $dS^{n-1}$ is the usual Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere.

Then $\nu$ is invariant under the geodesic flow on $SM$. By the comments below, I know what it means: Let $y=(x,v)\in A$, set $\gamma_y(s)=\exp_x(sv)$, then the geodesic flow is defined by $$ \Phi_t(y)=(\gamma_y(t),\dot{\gamma}_y(t)) $$ And $\Phi_t(A)=\{\Phi_t(y)|y \in A \}$. We have $\nu(\phi_t(A))=\nu(A)$.

Can you give a direct proof without introducing cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form?

Let $M$ be a complete n dimensional Riemannian manifold. $vol$ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let $$ SM=\{(x,v)|x\in M, v\in T_xM, \|v\|=1\} $$ be the unit tangent bundle of $M$. Then $SM$ will be equipped with the Liouville measure $\nu$. Given a subset $A=(U,A_x)\subset SM$, where $U\subset M$ is a subset of $M$, $A_x$ is a subset of the unit ball of the tangent space at $x\in U$, $\nu$ is defined by $$ v(A)=\int_U \int_{A_x} dS^{n-1} dvol(x) $$ where $dS^{n-1}$ is the usual Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere.

Then $\nu$ is invariant under the geodesic flow on $SM$. By the comments below, I know what it means: Let $y=(x,v)\in A$, set $\gamma_y(s)=\exp_x(sv)$, then the geodesic flow is defined by $$ \Phi_t(y)=(\gamma_y(t),\dot{\gamma}_y(t)) $$ And $\Phi_t(A)=\{\Phi_t(y)|y \in A \}$. We have $\nu(\phi_t(A))=\nu(A)$.

Can you give a direct proof without introducing cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form?

Let $M$ be a complete n dimensional Riemannian manifold. $vol$ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let $$ SM=\{(x,v)|x\in M, v\in T_xM, \|v\|=1\} $$ be the unit tangent bundle of $M$. Then $SM$ will be equipped with the Liouville measure $\nu$. Given a subset $A=(U,A_x)\subset SM$, where $U\subset M$ is a subset of $M$, $A_x$ is a subset of the unit sphere of the tangent space at $x\in U$, $\nu$ is defined by $$ v(A)=\int_U \int_{A_x} dS^{n-1} dvol(x) $$ where $dS^{n-1}$ is the usual Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere.

Then $\nu$ is invariant under the geodesic flow on $SM$. By the comments below, I know what it means: Let $y=(x,v)\in A$, set $\gamma_y(s)=\exp_x(sv)$, then the geodesic flow is defined by $$ \Phi_t(y)=(\gamma_y(t),\dot{\gamma}_y(t)) $$ And $\Phi_t(A)=\{\Phi_t(y)|y \in A \}$. We have $\nu(\phi_t(A))=\nu(A)$.

Can you give a direct proof without introducing cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form?

edited title
Link
oneyear
  • 109
  • 1
  • 4

How to understandprove Liouville measure is invariant under geodesic flow?

deleted 72 characters in body
Source Link
oneyear
  • 109
  • 1
  • 4

Let $M$ be a complete n dimensional Riemannian manifold. $vol$ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let $$ SM=\{(x,v)|x\in M, v\in T_xM, \|v\|=1\} $$ be the unit tangent bundle of $M$. Then $SM$ will be equipped with the Liouville measure $\nu$. Given a subset $A=(U,A_x)\subset SM$, where $U\subset M$ is a subset of $M$, $A_x$ is a subset of the unit ball of the tangent space at $x\in U$, $\nu$ is defined by $$ v(A)=\int_U \int_{A_x} dS^{n-1} dvol(x) $$ where $dS^{n-1}$ is the usual Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere.

Then $\nu$ is invariant under the geodesic flow on $SM$. By the comments below, I don't know what it means. Do it mean: Let $\Omega\subset M$ be a domain$y=(x,v)\in A$, given a unit vector field $V \in SM$ defined on set $\Omega$$\gamma_y(s)=\exp_x(sv)$, considerthen the geodesic flow is defined by $$ \Phi_t(\Omega)=\{x \in M|x=\exp(tV(y)) \text{ for some } y\in \Omega \} $$$$ \Phi_t(y)=(\gamma_y(t),\dot{\gamma}_y(t)) $$ ThenAnd $vol(\Phi_t(\Omega))=vol(\Omega)$?$\Phi_t(A)=\{\Phi_t(y)|y \in A \}$. We have $\nu(\phi_t(A))=\nu(A)$.

If I misunderstand it, canCan you show the correct one and give a direct proof without introducing cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form?

Let $M$ be a complete n dimensional Riemannian manifold. $vol$ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let $$ SM=\{(x,v)|x\in M, v\in T_xM, \|v\|=1\} $$ be the unit tangent bundle of $M$. Then $SM$ will be equipped with the Liouville measure $\nu$. Given a subset $A=(U,A_x)\subset SM$, where $U\subset M$ is a subset of $M$, $A_x$ is a subset of the unit ball of the tangent space at $x\in U$, $\nu$ is defined by $$ v(A)=\int_U \int_{A_x} dS^{n-1} dvol(x) $$ where $dS^{n-1}$ is the usual Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere.

Then $\nu$ is invariant under the geodesic flow on $SM$. I don't know what it means. Do it mean: Let $\Omega\subset M$ be a domain, given a unit vector field $V \in SM$ defined on $\Omega$, consider the geodesic flow $$ \Phi_t(\Omega)=\{x \in M|x=\exp(tV(y)) \text{ for some } y\in \Omega \} $$ Then $vol(\Phi_t(\Omega))=vol(\Omega)$?

If I misunderstand it, can you show the correct one and give a direct proof without introducing cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form?

Let $M$ be a complete n dimensional Riemannian manifold. $vol$ denotes the n dimensional Hausdorff measure. Let $$ SM=\{(x,v)|x\in M, v\in T_xM, \|v\|=1\} $$ be the unit tangent bundle of $M$. Then $SM$ will be equipped with the Liouville measure $\nu$. Given a subset $A=(U,A_x)\subset SM$, where $U\subset M$ is a subset of $M$, $A_x$ is a subset of the unit ball of the tangent space at $x\in U$, $\nu$ is defined by $$ v(A)=\int_U \int_{A_x} dS^{n-1} dvol(x) $$ where $dS^{n-1}$ is the usual Lebesgue measure on the unit sphere.

Then $\nu$ is invariant under the geodesic flow on $SM$. By the comments below, I know what it means: Let $y=(x,v)\in A$, set $\gamma_y(s)=\exp_x(sv)$, then the geodesic flow is defined by $$ \Phi_t(y)=(\gamma_y(t),\dot{\gamma}_y(t)) $$ And $\Phi_t(A)=\{\Phi_t(y)|y \in A \}$. We have $\nu(\phi_t(A))=\nu(A)$.

Can you give a direct proof without introducing cotangent bundle, 1-form, 2-form?

Source Link
oneyear
  • 109
  • 1
  • 4
Loading