Timeline for A conjecture based on Wilson's theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 10, 2015 at 22:24 | history | edited | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed superfluous ( ) in the numerator
|
Dec 9, 2015 at 9:56 | history | edited | martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
Dec 7, 2015 at 12:14 | answer | added | Alexey Ustinov | timeline score: 11 | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 12:13 | vote | accept | martin | ||
Dec 7, 2015 at 12:06 | answer | added | Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta | timeline score: 35 | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 12:05 | comment | added | Sean Eberhard | With @YCor's notation, if it's reasonable to assume that $i$ and $c_i$ behave roughly independently then one would have $\frac1p \sum i c_i \approx \left(\frac1p \sum i\right) \left(\frac1p \sum c_i\right) \approx p^2/4$, so this heuristically justifies the $1/8$. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:58 | history | edited | martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:58 | comment | added | barak manos | It might help to note that $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\dfrac{\sum\limits_{k=2}^{n/2}k(n-k)-1}{n^3} = \frac{1}{12}$. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:53 | history | edited | martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:49 | comment | added | YCor | Also the original formulation with $(k-1)/p_n$ was natural because this quotient is indeed an integer. In the new formulation, the $-1$ in $k-1$ seems artificial and can be removed since its contribution tends to 0. Second, the sum $\sum_A k$ is indexed by a quotient set of $\{2,\dots,p-2\}$ (modded out by the inverse involution). An alternative is to denote by $c_i$ the inverse of $i$ mod $p$ in $\{1,\dots,p-1\}$ and write the sum as $\frac12\sum_{2\le i\le p-2}ic_i$. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:49 | comment | added | YCor | Because as a set, $\{12,12,45,56\}=\{12,45,56\}$. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:47 | comment | added | martin | @YCor ok, will alter, but what should I call $A_p$ if not a set? | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:46 | comment | added | YCor | You can't say $A$ is a set, since you take multiplicities into account. Also you should denote it as $A_p$ and write $A_{p_n}$ instead of $A$ in the conjecture. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:39 | history | edited | martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 49 characters in body
|
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:29 | comment | added | barak manos | You might as well write it as $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\dfrac{\sum\limits_{k \in A}k-1}{(p_n)^3}\approx\frac18$. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:26 | comment | added | barak manos | You might as well take that $P_n$ outside the $\sum$. | |
Dec 7, 2015 at 11:23 | history | asked | martin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |