Timeline for Axiom of choice and a set in the plane that intersects every line in two points
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 21, 2019 at 13:45 | comment | added | Will Brian | Great question! This one is closely related: mathoverflow.net/questions/272527/…. | |
Feb 21, 2019 at 9:59 | answer | added | Ralf Schindler | timeline score: 3 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Dec 4, 2015 at 0:56 | comment | added | Ashutosh | On measure and category: There is a 2-point set within $\{z \in \mathbb{R}^2 : |z| \in C\})$ where $C$ is any set of reals which, say, meets every interval on a perfect set . So there is always a meager null 2-point set. | |
Dec 4, 2015 at 0:13 | comment | added | Ashutosh | Arnie Miller showed that you don't need a well ordering of reals in the sense that there are ZF models with 2-point sets where the set of reals cannot be well ordered: math.wisc.edu/~miller/res/two-pt.pdf He also showed that in $L$, there are conanalytic 2-point sets which is the best known upper bound - An analytic 2-point set is necessarily Borel. Mauldin has results connecting this to geometric measure theory: math.unt.edu/~mauldin/papers/no100.pdf | |
Dec 3, 2015 at 23:14 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | It seems that this is open whether or not such set can even be Borel, let alone $G_\delta$. In that case, I think you can probably construct one without appealing to the axiom of choice. | |
Dec 3, 2015 at 23:04 | history | asked | Iván Ongay Valverde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |