Timeline for How large can the smallest generating set of a group $G$ of order $n$ be?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4, 2015 at 11:33 | comment | added | Frieder Ladisch | @GeoffRobinson: Thank you very much! | |
Dec 4, 2015 at 5:58 | history | edited | Geoff Robinson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo
|
Dec 4, 2015 at 0:42 | history | edited | Geoff Robinson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spacing
|
Dec 4, 2015 at 0:20 | comment | added | Geoff Robinson | @FriederLadisch : The result was proved independently by Guralnick and Lucchini at around the same time, it was not a joint paper - I had forgotten that myself! | |
Dec 4, 2015 at 0:18 | history | edited | Geoff Robinson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation about proofs by Guralnick and Lucchini.
|
Dec 3, 2015 at 23:06 | history | edited | Geoff Robinson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor typo
|
Dec 3, 2015 at 14:21 | comment | added | Derek Holt | Simple groups are all $2$-generated. | |
Dec 3, 2015 at 14:19 | comment | added | Ofir Gorodetsky | Interesting. I have a related vague question: Assume $G$ embedds in $S_n$. Your answer gives a bound of $n$ on the number of generators. For abelian $G$ this is tight (up to a multiplicative constant, maybe). Is there some family of $G$'s for which we have a better bound? E.g., simple subgroups of $S_n$? | |
Dec 3, 2015 at 14:11 | vote | accept | Peter | ||
Dec 3, 2015 at 14:06 | history | answered | Geoff Robinson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |