Skip to main content

Timeline for "Fractally self-similar" numbers

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 1, 2015 at 8:33 vote accept მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Nov 30, 2015 at 18:57 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Yes I see now - there is no real difference between "outside" and "inside" given transformations that interchange them. One more question though, about the penultimate paragraph - I don't quite see why in case of growing denominator ratios the pictures will converge to a zoomed-out picture: in case of quadratic irrationality there was that unique conjugate and iterates of the inverse of $f$ accumulated to it. But if now $\phi$ is not quadratic anymore, not even algebraic, why will turning the process backwards yield convergence to anything?
Nov 30, 2015 at 18:13 comment added Adam P. Goucher You can reconstruct all the circles. Specifically, given three externally tangent discs in $\mathbb{C} \cup \{ \infty \}$ (two of which are the interiors of those two circles; the other is the lower half-plane), you can uniquely construct an Apollonian disc packing. The Ford circles are precisely the discs in the Apollonian gasket which are tangent to the real line.
Nov 30, 2015 at 18:07 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Still trying to digest your answer. The key point seems to be much the same as with my previous question - that two circles determine the rest. Except more precisely they determine the portion of the tesselation confined between them, I don't quite see how to reconstruct anything outside.
Nov 30, 2015 at 15:50 history answered Adam P. Goucher CC BY-SA 3.0