Timeline for What are some examples of colorful language in serious mathematics papers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2022 at 17:07 | comment | added | Sambo | I almost upvoted, but this is too perfect to be broken. | |
| Jan 8, 2022 at 5:44 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced the dead link
|
| Dec 16, 2012 at 13:32 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Voted back down to 27, although it feels strange to downvote this. | |
| Dec 9, 2012 at 18:29 | comment | added | pinaki | Oops! I just voted up and destroyed the magic of 27! I am really sorry, now if I downvote it becomes 26! | |
| Mar 11, 2011 at 6:19 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | -1 as per your wishes. But +1 and +1 again for the answer. | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 9:54 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | 28 votes are not a problem: just replace "lines on a cubic surface" by "bitangents to a plane quartic". I'm sure it works. | |
| Jun 8, 2010 at 13:27 | comment | added | Abhishek Parab | +1 but not voted up! | |
| Jun 8, 2010 at 13:05 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | Now we just have to get your comment to 27 upvotes as well. | |
| Jun 8, 2010 at 0:45 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | voting down per your wishes... | |
| Jun 8, 2010 at 0:37 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | I just edited to include a link to the paper. | |
| Jun 8, 2010 at 0:37 | history | edited | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added link
|
| Jun 7, 2010 at 19:58 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | If you edit your post, I will remove my upvote so you can be at 27 again. My vote is currently to old to change without your editing the post. BTW will your total go down to 27 or 26 if I click "downvote?" | |
| Jun 2, 2010 at 13:07 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | I hate to comment like this, but for community wiki, I feel less bad, and it won't affect the ranking at this moment...could someone vote this one up? I'd rather like it to have 27 votes, but no more. It feels fitting. | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 19:36 | history | answered | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |