Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jun 14, 2016 at 19:07 history edited Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected typo in title, improved overall spelling, minor stylistic changes
S Jun 14, 2016 at 19:07 history suggested jeq CC BY-SA 3.0
Typo in title.
Jun 14, 2016 at 18:54 review Suggested edits
S Jun 14, 2016 at 19:07
Jun 14, 2016 at 17:47 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 15, 2016 at 17:18 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 16, 2016 at 0:06 comment added Steven Stadnicki (Also, pedantry requires me to belatedly point out that by mathematical standards these functions aren't particularly 'fast-growing' at all - they're dominated by functions at level 3 of the usual fast-growing hierarchies. :-) See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast-growing_hierarchy for details)
Nov 17, 2015 at 11:21 answer added András Salamon timeline score: 1
Nov 16, 2015 at 19:38 comment added Douglas Zare See math.stackexchange.com/questions/135787/….
Nov 16, 2015 at 19:34 comment added Steven Stadnicki The log of this product is just $\sum_{j=1}^n j^i\log j$ and this sum is easily approximable by all the usual methods (e.g., Euler-Maclaurin); in particular, the lead term is $\Theta(n^{i+1}\log n)$ and the constant is easily found.
Nov 16, 2015 at 19:10 comment added András Salamon For the revised question, there appears to be a straightforward bound $2^{n^{i+1}/\log(i+1)} \le F(n,i) \le 2^{n^{i+1+1/(e\ln 2)}}$ (modulo errors on my part) but getting it tighter than that seems to require a lot of work.
Nov 16, 2015 at 18:38 history edited user76479 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 38 characters in body
Nov 16, 2015 at 15:24 comment added Emil Jeřábek $n^{n^{i+1}}$ is too much, it should be rather something like $\exp((1+o(1))n^{i+1}(\log n)/(i+1))$. Well, the $\Theta(n^{n^{i+1}})$ bound is already contradicted by the $i=0$ case.
Nov 16, 2015 at 14:57 comment added Douglas Zare It's not reasonable to guess $\Theta$-level precision of rapidly growing functions. Try expressing $\Theta(2^{n!})$ in a nontrivial fashion. Stirling's formula $n! \sim \sqrt{2\pi n} (n/e)^n$ does not narrow down $n!$ enough to approximate $2^{n!}$ up to a constant or anywhere close.
Nov 16, 2015 at 12:30 comment added András Salamon $\log F(n,i)=\sum_{j=1}^n j^{i+\log\log j/\log j}$.
S Nov 16, 2015 at 11:32 history suggested Tadashi
Added relevant tag
Nov 16, 2015 at 11:04 review Suggested edits
S Nov 16, 2015 at 11:32
Nov 16, 2015 at 10:45 history edited user76479 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Nov 16, 2015 at 10:26 history asked user76479 CC BY-SA 3.0